Fälle von Religion

Abstract

The article explores the specific role of psychological case studies for the scientification of religion, focusing particularly on the history of academic conferences. Beginning with foundational reflections on the epistemological importance of case studies and scientific conferences as sites of specific knowledge production, the analysis offers an illustrative glimpse into the evolving disciplinary discourse of psychology of religion. Specifically, the first international congresses on the psychology of religion held in 1930 and 1931 are examined. The analysis focuses mainly on the relevant conference proceedings and the significance of case studies for establishing the psychology of religion as an empirical science. Notably, the case study of Therese Neumann von Konnersreuth attracted attention, as it sparked considerable controversy not only within scientific circles but also in political discourse. The second congress in 1931 focused on the issue of unbelief, serving as a response to the perceived religious crisis of the time and once again relying on empirical research for its discussions. Both congresses stand for a shift in the disciplinary perspective: moving away from earlier “psychologistic” approaches in favor of a more apologetic stance.